Home
 
 
There's an obvious idea here, but people tend to pay a bit more attention to scientists than others. A study has been published which attempts to classify drugs by actual harmfulness, rather than arbitrary cultural BS standards. The results should surprise no one.
clipped from www.bris.ac.uk

A new study published today in the Lancet proposes that drugs should be classified by the amount of harm that they do

Alcohol and tobacco more harmful than cannabis and ecstacy.

New ‘matrix of harm’ for drugs of abuse

Press release issued 23 March 2007

The new ranking places alcohol and tobacco in the upper half of the league table. These socially accepted drugs were judged more harmful than cannabis, and substantially more dangerous than the Class A drugs LSD, 4-methylthioamphetamine and ecstasy.


  1. the physical harm to the individual user caused by the drug

  2. the tendency of the drug to induce dependence

  3. the effect of drug use on families, communities, and society

The process proved simple, and yielded roughly similar scores for drug harm when used by two separate groups of experts.

“Drug policy is primarily aimed at reducing the harm to individual users, their families and society. But at present there is no rational, evidence-based method for assessing the harm of drugs.
 powered by clipmarksblog it
 
 
Post a comment in response:
From:
( )Anonymous - this user has disabled anonymous posting.
( )OpenID Help
(will be screened if not a friend)
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
   Help
Message:

 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting. Help